jan 20-26, 2011
BLOGISTA
By Cha Monforte
The case of the contract of the Christian Investigation and Security Agency (CISA) to secure the Davao del Norte Capitol is turning now to be quite an interesting case for the court to decide. Naa man goy contentious legal question nga dili maresolbar sa sulod kay puros may mga puntos ang duruha ka managbanging partido, ug maresolbar lamang kini sa mga hanas sa balaod. Aw, inato, praktikalan man lang ni ang ato. Kinsa man diay ang mohukom? Di ang atong korte.
Our editorial tells the contentious issues and circumstances surrounding the bidding and awarding of the security services contract won by CISA. Tataw nga gi-bypass gyod si Vice Gov. Victorio “Baby” Suaybaguio Jr, kinsa maoy acting governor gikan sa Dec. 20, 2010 hangtod Enero 8, 2001 sa pag-abot ni Gov. RDR sa probinsya gikan sa Estados Unidos.
Vice Gov. Suaybaguio was evidently bypassed by the Capitol triumvirate composed of provincial administrator Rufo Peligro, provincial Bids and Awards Committee (BAC) chairman and provincial general services officer Samson Sanchez and provincial legal officer Atty. Jennifer Namoc. A rose between two thorns. If they have no respect to the person occupying the post of the acting governor, they should have respected (and they ought to respect) that post occupied by Vice Gov. Suaybaguio.
There is a need to settle the legal question in court. But who can file a case against the governor and the Capitol triumvirate? Sa Davao del Norte, kinsay mamahimong Boardmember Quisumbing ug tulo niya ka kaubanan sa SP sa Cebu kinsa mikaso kang Cebu Gov. Gwendolyn Garcia kabahin sa panginahanglan sa prior authorization o approval sa SP usa mokontrata ang gobernador bisag naaprobahan na ang annual budget diin anaa nahisulod ang galastuhan sa maong kontrata?
The bidding where CISA won was Dec. 20, 2010. Taking PA Rufo Peligro’s assertion that there was no need for an SP’s prior authorization for the sake of argument, matud pa mismo sa balaod, Akta Republika 9184, gikinahanglan japon nga mo-issue ang naglingkod nga gobernador ug Notice to Proceed sulod sa 7 ka adlaw human madeklarar ang winner sa bidding. Sa bidding diin midaug ang CISA kay gi-knock out man sa BAC ang lowest bidder nga United Field Sea Watchman and Checkers Agency (UFSWCA), ang deadline sa required 7 days para sa Notice to Proceed Enero 6, 2011 kanus-a si Vice Gov. Suaybaguio japon ang acting gov kinsa may tanang gahom sa governor gawas lang sa gahom sa pag-hire ug pag-fire ug mga empleyado. Morag mao kining parteha ang Achilles’ heel o patyanan sa maong transaksyon kung makalusot man nga di na kinahanglan ang prior SP authorization.
There is no debate now as to the noble purposes and objectives the privatization of security services in the Mankilam Capitol. These are all valid. But in good governance, procedures must still be followed. This is an interesting case that must be settled in court at the earliest time while the CISA guards have not yet eaten a budget of the approved annual budget, or as in Cebu case, the COA declared so that Gov. Garcia’s transaction was illegal as it needed prior SP authorization. Nah, basig ma-disallow pa ang makuhang kwarta sa CISA gikan sa Kapitolyo ug makatapada ug dako and Capitol triumvirate apil na si Gov. RDR. We are awaiting if this case is within the legal penumbra of the 2008 Supreme Court ruling on Cebu Boardmembers Gabriel Garcia et al versus Gov. Garcia (GR 175527). Nahisulod ba kini bisag sa kilo-kilom nga bahin diha sa buhagay sa sulaw sa bilog nga buwan kalabot sa maong desisyon sa Korte Suprema?
Filed under: Vice Governor Victorio “Baby” Suaybaguio Jr, vice gov. victorio "baby" suaybaguio jr
Recent Comments